On 17 July 2024, CWB Serbia office received a decision issued by the Serbian Supreme Court on 28 December 2023 confirming the first- and second-instance decisions stating that the import and sale of car parts visually identical to those protected by industrial design registrations valid in Serbia constituted industrial design infringement. This final instance decision confirms the first ruling of its kind in Serbian practice related to counterfeit car parts, and is therefore significant because the task of the Supreme Court is to standardize judicial practice, and the lower courts are almost always guided by the views of the Supreme Court.

CWB Serbia office represented the right holders, French car manufacturer Renault and its Romanian subsidiary Dacia, in court proceedings against a Serbian company that was distributing replacement headlights, side rearview mirrors and grilles for the Dacia Sandero car without the plaintiff’s consent. The car parts were visually identical to the original ones protected by Renault’s designs and they bore Dacia’s trademarks.

First, an attempt was made to settle the matter out of court. A Cease and Desist letter was sent to the Serbian company, who refused to comply with the plaintiff’s demands. A request for securing evidence was then filed with the Commercial Court in Belgrade. The court granted the request, but the defendant refused to allow CWB Serbia representatives and Commercial Court officials into their premises. Finally, a lawsuit was filed with the Commercial Court on 15 November 2017.

During the proceedings, which lasted nearly four years, two court-appointed intellectual property expert witnesses prepared expert opinions confirming both design and trademark infringement. A court-appointed financial expert witness determined the damage caused by the infringement based on the number of counterfeit car parts sold by the Serbian company between 2014 and 2020 (200 headlights, 30 side rearview mirrors and 71 grilles). Finally, the Commercial Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff on 19 July 2021 and, for the first time in Serbian practice, stated that the import and sale of replacement car parts visually identical to those protected by industrial design registrations constituted industrial design infringement. The fact that the court also awarded damages in this case is important because it is very rare in Serbian practice for a court to award damages caused by intellectual property infringement, particularly design infringement. The Commercial Court’s decision was appealed before the Commercial Appellate Court on 11 October 2021 and then a revision was filed before the Supreme Court on 19 June 2023, but the final instance court confirmed the Commercial Court’s initial decision.

This ruling is significant because it will allow right holders to invoke it in their struggle against this type of infringement, potentially beginning to put an end to fake auto parts. There have been no rulings of this kind in Serbian practice so far and the European practice related to design infringing car parts is itself inconclusive.

By: Branislav Krnetić

For more information, please contact Branislav Krnetić at our Serbia office.